Journalist admits he didn't vote for Vinicius because "he is not an example of fair-play"
Salvadoran journalist Bruno Porzio publically admitted to having ruled out Vinicius Jr from his Ballon d'Or voting list. The writer from 'El Grafico' explained that he does not believe the Brazilian represents an example of fair-play in football. That said, he equally revealed that he only put Rodri in 7th position in his list because he claims that "Spain won the Euros in an illigitimate way."
2 weeks ago
Bit by bit, the Ballon d'Or press votes are starting to leak out or be revealed. Bruno Porzio, from the Salvadoran outlet 'El Grafico', is an example of the latter, as he did not hesitate in admitting to the public who he voted for. The journalist not only placed Rodri in seventh position in his voting list, but also left out Vinicius Junior from his top ten entirely.
"He is not an example for fair-play," said the journalist from El Salvador, as he explained one of his reasonings for excluding the Brazilian. That said, he insists the main reason that led him to his decision is another one. "That's not the reason why I didn't vote for him, I didn't because he is a player who's restricted to a limited space on the pitch. Let's not take into account what happened against Borussia Dortmund">Borussia Dortmund when he ran across the pitch for 70 metres because in that instant they [Dortmund] let him do that. He's a football who only plays there, he is not at the centre of play for Real Madrid."
"He is important, but personally, I think Jude Bellingham was much more important this season. Instead of putting him [Vinicius] eighth, ninth or even tenth, it's better to simply exclude him. It didn't do him any good. In terms of fair play and what the others have won, I think he's a player that does not exactly.... catch my eye and so, I can't consider him worthy of the Ballon d'Or".
Pozio also recalls having discussions with the Spanish media to find reasons to vote for Vinicius. "I remember talking to Tomas Roncero (from the outlet 'AS' and the show 'El Chiringuito') and telling him to convince me. He gave me few examples like the fact that he scored in the Champions League final and I thought scoring in the Champions League? What's the name of that German player who scored in the World Cup final? Who remembers Mario Gotze? These are situations that you have to tie up well in order to be able to select. It seems to me that Vinicius wasn't there," he concluded.
"He is not an example for fair-play," said the journalist from El Salvador, as he explained one of his reasonings for excluding the Brazilian. That said, he insists the main reason that led him to his decision is another one. "That's not the reason why I didn't vote for him, I didn't because he is a player who's restricted to a limited space on the pitch. Let's not take into account what happened against Borussia Dortmund">Borussia Dortmund when he ran across the pitch for 70 metres because in that instant they [Dortmund] let him do that. He's a football who only plays there, he is not at the centre of play for Real Madrid."
"He is important, but personally, I think Jude Bellingham was much more important this season. Instead of putting him [Vinicius] eighth, ninth or even tenth, it's better to simply exclude him. It didn't do him any good. In terms of fair play and what the others have won, I think he's a player that does not exactly.... catch my eye and so, I can't consider him worthy of the Ballon d'Or".
Pozio also recalls having discussions with the Spanish media to find reasons to vote for Vinicius. "I remember talking to Tomas Roncero (from the outlet 'AS' and the show 'El Chiringuito') and telling him to convince me. He gave me few examples like the fact that he scored in the Champions League final and I thought scoring in the Champions League? What's the name of that German player who scored in the World Cup final? Who remembers Mario Gotze? These are situations that you have to tie up well in order to be able to select. It seems to me that Vinicius wasn't there," he concluded.
Comments